6 min read

Collapse Into Fragility

A recursive meditation on American unraveling — sourced, unsentimental, and echo-laden

1. Hollowed institutions

Over the last four decades, U.S. public institutions have experienced systematic erosion. Regulatory agencies have been captured by the industries they were meant to oversee, a phenomenon widely documented in economic and political science literature. The judiciary, particularly at the federal level, has been reshaped through ideological appointment pipelines that prioritize partisanship over impartiality. Meanwhile, extreme gerrymandering and voter suppression have diluted electoral accountability.

Result: Governance increasingly serves entrenched private interests. Power still moves — but only in the service of capital. For the rest, paralysis is policy.

Citations:

  • Gilens, Martin & Benjamin I. Page (2014). Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens.
    • Found economic elites and organized interest groups have substantial influence over U.S. policy; average citizens have near-zero.
  • Carpenter, Daniel. Reputation and Power: Organizational Image and Pharmaceutical Regulation at the FDA (Princeton University Press, 2010).
    • Landmark text on regulatory capture in the U.S.
  • Levitsky, Steven & Daniel Ziblatt. How Democracies Die (Crown Publishing, 2018).
    • Details the breakdown of democratic norms and institutional guardrails.
  • Brennan Center for Justice. Extreme Gerrymandering & the 2020 Election.
    • Clear data on district manipulation and its long-term structural effects.

2. A populace primed for spectacle, not substance

Mass media in the United States underwent a profound transformation in the late 20th and early 21st centuries, shifting from investigative journalism toward ratings-driven infotainment. News platforms, under pressure from consolidated corporate ownership and the 24-hour cycle, increasingly emphasized sensationalism over substance. Simultaneously, the education system prioritized standardized testing and vocational sorting over critical thinking, while saddling students with unprecedented levels of debt.

Digital platforms absorbed the remnants of public discourse, reconfiguring civic participation into a spectacle of performance, virality, and algorithmic manipulation. Emotional salience replaced deliberative judgment. Truth became a branding problem.

Result: When spectacle trains the eye, complexity disappears. In that blur, democracy became theater — performed rather than practiced.

Citations:

  • Postman, Neil. Amusing Ourselves to Death (1985).
    • Prescient critique of television turning discourse into entertainment; eerily predictive of the internet age.
  • McChesney, Robert W. Rich Media, Poor Democracy (1999).
    • Analysis of media consolidation and decline of journalism.
  • Arum, Richard & Josipa Roksa. Academically Adrift (2011).
    • Documents stagnation in critical thinking among college students despite rising costs.
  • Pew Research Center (2023). News Use Across Social Media Platforms.
    • Demonstrates shift of news consumption to algorithmically driven platforms.
  • Zuboff, Shoshana. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism (2019).
    • Details how user data is weaponized to shape perception, identity, and choice.

3. Empire fatigue

The United States maintained overwhelming global military presence into the 21st century. At its peak, it operated more than 750 bases in over 80 countries. This projection of power remained unmatched. But while the outward reach expanded, the domestic foundation withered.

Defense spending rose steadily. Infrastructure funding did not. Roads cracked, bridges collapsed, water systems failed, and schools decayed. Public hospitals were restructured into billing systems. Civic trust eroded as televised wars continued and basic services faltered.

After 9/11, the country poured trillions into conflict zones while neglecting its own cities. Veterans returned to underfunded clinics. Rural areas lost maternity wards. The empire endured, but the republic frayed.

Result: America retained the architecture of global dominance but lacked internal cohesion. It became an empire adrift: strength projected abroad, rot left untreated at home.

Citations:

  • Andrew Bacevich, The Limits of Power: The End of American Exceptionalism (2008)
    • Argues that U.S. foreign policy became unsustainable, disconnected from domestic well-being and strategic necessity.
  • American Society of Civil Engineers, 2021 Infrastructure Report Card
    • Gave the U.S. an overall C− rating; chronic underinvestment across sectors from water to transit to broadband.
  • Linda Bilmes & Joseph Stiglitz, The Three Trillion Dollar War (2008)
    • Tallied long-term costs of Iraq and Afghanistan wars; money diverted from domestic renewal.
  • Chalmers Johnson, The Sorrows of Empire (2004)
    • Explored the strategic and democratic dangers of America’s global military sprawl.
  • Congressional Budget Office, U.S. Military Base Realignment and Closure reports
    • Offers detailed breakdowns of overseas base spending and its persistent drain on discretionary budgets.

4. The weaponization of nostalgia

In the absence of a shared vision for the future, nostalgia filled the void. It was repackaged not as memory but as grievance. Populist leaders rose promising a return to a golden age — but what they offered was not restoration. It was retaliation.

“Great again” became the chant, but the target wasn’t decay. It was change. The imagined past was cleansed of contradiction: no labor struggle, no racial reckoning, no democratic expansion — only myth, static and sacred.

That narrative became political fuel. National memory fractured. The story of America splintered into warring timelines.

Result: Memory turned into ammunition. History was remixed into grievance. Identity was refashioned as exclusion. Historical literacy collapsed into selective reverence.

Citations:

  • Ruth Ben-Ghiat, Strongmen: Mussolini to the Present (2020)
    • Explores how authoritarian figures use nostalgia as a political strategy to legitimize power and suppress dissent.
  • Jason Stanley, How Fascism Works: The Politics of Us and Them (2018)
    • Details how appeals to a mythic past are central to fascist rhetoric, often at the expense of democratic institutions.
  • Richard Hofstadter, The Paranoid Style in American Politics (1964)
    • Analyzes the recurrent use of conspiratorial nostalgia in American right-wing movements.
  • George Packer, Last Best Hope: America in Crisis and Renewal (2021)
    • Argues that American civic identity has fragmented, with myth supplanting shared memory and common purpose.

5. A captured opposition

The party that once championed labor stopped naming capital as the antagonist. Economic power was left largely unspoken, even as wealth concentrated and the middle class evaporated. Instead, political energy shifted toward symbolic representation — often necessary, sometimes profound, but increasingly disconnected from material change.

The language of identity became ritualized. Political correctness hardened into a cultural litmus test. Inclusion became performance. Complexity gave way to policing. What began as a movement for justice became, in the eyes of many, an etiquette war — one they were losing.

Hope was still marketed, but now as branding. Structural transformation was repackaged as incremental progress. And those demanding more were told to wait. Again.

All while the foundations crumbled beneath their slogans.

Result: The firewall turned to theater. Fascism didn’t rise — it walked in unopposed.

Citations:

  • Thomas Frank, Listen, Liberal: Or, What Ever Happened to the Party of the People? (2016)
    • Charts the Democratic Party’s abandonment of its working-class base in favor of professional-class liberalism.
  • Astra Taylor, Democracy May Not Exist, But We’ll Miss It When It’s Gone (2019)
    • Explores the structural contradictions in modern democratic institutions and the failure of opposition parties to offer substantive alternatives.
  • Matt Taibbi, Hate Inc. (2019) and political essays
    • Critiques the media-entwined political class and the performative nature of resistance politics.
  • Adolph Reed Jr., essays in The Baffler and Nonsite.org
    • Offers a deep critique of the neoliberal center-left’s shift away from material politics and its complicity in institutional decay.

6. Nuclear legacy without moral legitimacy

The United States retains a nuclear arsenal vast enough to end civilization. Its launch protocols remain rooted in Cold War doctrine — a system designed for bipolar rivalry, not multi-polar instability or domestic political chaos.

But the moral scaffolding that once justified this power has fractured. The institutions tasked with oversight are fraying. The political class is unstable. Strategic clarity has been replaced by short-term theatrics and algorithmic brinkmanship. The assumption that only rational actors would ever hold the codes no longer holds.

Meanwhile, the public barely registers the danger. Nuclear weapons have become background noise — symbols of past horror, not present risk.

Result: The U.S. maintains apocalyptic power without coherent restraint. The doctrine of deterrence presumes a world that no longer exists. The launch codes remain. The judgment that once restrained them does not.

Citations:

  • Eric Schlosser, Command and Control: Nuclear Weapons, the Damascus Accident, and the Illusion of Safety (2013)
    • Reveals the systemic fragility, human error, and near-miss accidents inside U.S. nuclear infrastructure.
  • Daniel Ellsberg, The Doomsday Machine: Confessions of a Nuclear War Planner (2017)
    • Explores the hidden mechanisms and deeply irrational assumptions behind U.S. nuclear doctrine.
  • Lawrence Freedman, The Future of War (2017)
    • Analyzes shifting global threats and the obsolescence of traditional nuclear strategy in asymmetric conflict.
  • William J. Perry & Tom Collina, The Button: The New Nuclear Arms Race and Presidential Power from Truman to Trump (2020)
    • Details how unilateral presidential authority over nuclear launch poses an existential risk.

Closing Argument: The Doctrine Has Failed

This was not a sudden fall, but a long forgetting. One layer at a time, the system devoured its own foundations.

You were told this was the price of freedom. That compromise was strategy. That caution was wisdom. That endless war was safety. That the dream still lived, somewhere, off-camera.

But the reality is simpler. They stopped steering the train. And now the engine runs on legacy systems — thermonuclear ones — operated by a political class performing for clicks.

We are armed for the end of the world.

But we are governed like a game show.

The doctrine assumes sanity. The launch codes assume legitimacy.

Neither is in evidence.

The prosecution rests. The danger does not.